Status: LIVE (concept stage)
WHAT IS A CITY CHALLENGE?
A 'City Challenge' is a large, complex, opportunity or issue with which the 'usual approach' is struggling and so requires a fresh approach, for which the timing is 'right', and which will likely require multiple BETA projects to explore. (Here's the 5 characteristics.)
CHALLENGE:
Based on conversations with the public and with staff, a shortlist of two challenges were presented to the City Council's senior management team for consideration.
They chose 'illegal dumping and waste' as the first City Challenge.
EXPLORATION:
A project team was formed with staff from across our Waste Department (for example it includes management, litter wardens and cleansing staff) and also staff who work within neighbourhoods.
We also teamed up with M.Co to co-explore this issue over a period of 27 working days (across several months). This very short phase was enough to gather some very useful information and to generate some key insights to enable this project to move to the solutions phase, and additonal research will be carried out, as necessary, as we proceed.
Here's is a summary presentation of some of the findings.
Some of the items that particularly stood out...
- Local shops are a key (under-used) touchpoint for bag customers
- As the largest landlord in the State, we have a point of influence
- Many waste services feel like they were designed for a different type of living (car-dependant, private storage, stay-at-home parents, etc).
- We need better data gathering
- We don’t make the rules of waste easy to understand for our users
- We produce lists that are not searchable (eg by Google).
APPROACH:
We were thinking about 2 things:
1. The research told us that this issue isn't arising from a single reason but many - and spread across governance, infrastructure, social and individual reasons - and so will require a broad array of responses.
(Click to enlarge.)
2. How could we better consider the following issues whilst we're exploring this challenge?
How can we...
- Improve waste services for the majority, whilst decreasing dumping which is by a minority?
- Solve multiple existing problems and headaches whilst doing this?
- Think about the range of lifestyles in modern society?
- Ensure the waste service is great for all members of our society?
- Tend towards simplicity rather than complexity?
- Get the core / backbone right that will ensure future flexibity to change?
- Ensure resilience?
- Create models alongside existing processes?
- Think about waste as an asset?
- Think about future challenges and not just the issues of today?
(For example...the Climate Crisis, changing mobility patterns, apartment-living, urban-living, digital services and modern expectations, online shopping, recyclables, circular economy…)
We're going to focus on “Better Waste Services” rather than “Solve Dumping”.
Here's the 7 reasons why we are taking this approach:
- This City Challenge arose from both citizen and staff suggestions – of which the majority of suggestions revolved around a variety of topics around waste, including a smaller number focussed on dumping. (Indeed, it's the reason why the hashtag/title for this project includes both the words dumping and waste as #DumpingWasteBETA.)
- As a ‘wicked problem’ (a challenge with multiple causes and feedback loops), attempting to solve the issue of illegal dumping will require a systemic perspective to ensure that we’re not just focussing on the resulting behaviours. Behaviour is an outcome of the interaction of 4 key forces as above – so this approach will ensure we consider the full range of forces in the system. This, in turn, will also increase the opportunities for spotting unexpected issues.
- Equally, it will enable us to think bigger. We will feel freer to also consider much bigger ideas (‘moonshots’) in addition to incremental changes.
“You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.” Buckminster Fuller - Dublin City Council is already exploring various approaches to “solve dumping” (eg Smart Dublin’s project). Focussing on better waste services will ensure we’re not overlapping with that work, and indeed those efforts (and previously-trialled approaches by our staff) can neatly fit within this project as necessary.
- Focussing on dumping will mean we’re focussed on the issues of today, whereas a focus on better services will also help us to future-proof our work ensuring it stays relevant longer.
- If we aim to “improve waste services with trickle-down impacts on dumping”, we will get more bang for our buck in two ways. It will likely include items that we will have to explore at some stage in any case (eg waste-related councillor motions), and it will also have benefits for all citizens as opposed to only improving edge-cases. Ie we’re trying to solve for “most people” as opposed to a small minority.
- Finally, switching the focus to “better waste services” rather than “illegal dumping” ensures the project will have a positive tone and outlook, which will greatly help with the development and discussion of solutions with citizens and staff. Also, importantly, it will also give us a much wider cohort of people to trial with.
Under this overall approach, we will trial individual BETA Project solutions, and the expectation is that they - overall - will add up to our aim.
What BETA Projects will we trial?
The BETA Projects under this City Challenge will follow the same pattern as all BETA Projects to date...
- We will gather ideas and suggestions from anyone and everyone. (You can add more here.)
- We will prioritise all of these on a regular basis.
- We will start at the top of the list, and work downwards, trialling the various ideas.
- We will scale whatever is found to work well.
The plan is to approach this Challenge over 2 stages:
- Let’s first focus on how we might improve the existing.
- Following this, we then shift to exploring new ideas.
We have compiled all of the staff, citizen, business and councillor suggestions from the past few years into a single list. [The list has come in from all sorts of channels, over different time periods, and so we've some housework to do to make it easy for people to read and understand. Once that's done, we'll add a link to the full list here.]
Trialling and Measuring Impact
Illegal dumping is an issue which occurs over a wider area, and measuring the impact of any individual trial interventions is that little bit harder. Therefore the plan is to pick a couple of 'trial areas' where we capture detailed metrics within, and where we will trial many of the ideas.
These areas should be ‘Goldilocks Areas’ with a “little bit of everything”…that way we would hope to learn about what might work across multiple areas of the city.
They should contain many of the following characteristics…
- Urban, predominately domestic, predominately bag collection.
- A clear neighbourhood boundary and name.
- Single area-based-cleaning team covers entire area.
- Entire area sits within a Waste Provider(s) area.
- Overlaps 2 boundaries: Collection Days, CCD/remainder
- Entire area sits within Waste Provider(s).
- Mostly bag streets, but with some bin streets or customers.
- Contains key waste services such as Bottle Bank, but equally has the type of waste services that much of the city has (eg it shouldn't be too near a Civic Amenity Centre as there's only two of them in the city).
- Some dumping is occurring, but not a dumping hotspot of the city.
- Proximity to the relevant staff to monitor trials.
- Mostly residential, but with some commercial.
- Mix of Private and Social Housing
- Mix of housing, apartments and multi-let flats/bedsits.
- Not too rich, not too poor.
- An area with Air BnB lettings
- A mixture of Irish and other nationalities, and a mixture of languages.
- Contains mixture of street types (main, residential, laneways, parks, etc)
- Already-established residents groups.
- Range of ages from children, families with children, students, older people.
We have chosen the areas of Stoneybatter and Portobello as the two trial locations. In essence, these will act as 'mini Dublins' (city centre Dublin anyway) where we hope our learnings will be transferrable to elsewhere in the city.
At a later date, we may change trial areas (for example to begin to include an area with a high level of dumping or a suburban area).
We'll soon be reaching out to residents and businesses in these areas to help us figure out good solutions that work well, and it's important to note that any trials carried out in these areas will be 'concept trials' and so will be fully removed at the end of the trial period.
We will be measuring impact at two levels - at the local project level (eg did the people using it find it to be a good solution, did it affect their waste practices, what did neighbours nearby think, etc) and at the neighbourhood level (did levels of dumping, or of waste or dumping practices, change at the wider neighbourhood level). [We'll add some further detail on this latter aspect over the next few weeks.]
CURRENT BETA PROJECTS (SPECIFIC TO THIS CITY CHALLENGE):
As we develop individual BETA Project trials under this City Challenge, we'll list them below...
BETA Projects are always made fully public, and we'll be looking for your input and suggestions into all of these trials.
SUGGESTIONS:
If you've any suggestions for how we might improve waste services, or address illegal dumping, you can add them here.
RELATED PROJECTS:
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
Get involved in the conversation below.
Kevin Langley, posted on 2018.05.30
I think there are certain areas of the city that are really bad these should be targeted full on,night vision cameras anything we can do to stop this filthy habit heavier penalties when people are caught
Reply to this comment
Steve grogan, posted on 2018.10.29
The Irish dumping problem is a systemic one. Private company service charges are excessive, unfair and undermine the polluter pays principle.
Most Europe countries pay for waste through general taxation. This allows them to have designated areas on every residential street with underground rubbish storage.
Why can this not be delivered in urban areas particularly in Dublin? Combining it with technology would mean to use the bins you need a barcode or smart card issued to every household. This allows you track waste volumes per user. It would also allow the council to own the infrastructure and vendors bid for collection contracts. Once implemented strong enforcement (currently lacking) and tracking of the system use would allow you to eliminate on street dumping.
Reply to this comment
Lu , posted on 2018.08.08
A massive amount of the waste and litter that I see on the streets results from the way waste is collected in the inner city. Many businesses and residents have their waste collected in prepaid bags from the street which are flimsy and break or are ripped apart by scavenging wildlife. It would be great to see a small robust waste store (similar to bin stores in modern developments) provided in these areas. No property that has the space for a wheelie bin should be forced to use bags.
Reply to this comment
Global Citizen, posted on 2018.09.06
Anyone can create and access open data on over 100+ types of litter incl illegal dumping anywhere @ openlittermap.com - it’s like Pokémon Go for Tidy towns
Reply to this comment
Mark Murphy, posted on 2018.09.19
We must look to introduce legislation that forces the landlords to incorporate the waste management charges into the rent as i bebieve the majority of the dumping comes from rented property.If the land loard is responsible he/she will be easier to trek down and follow up on. There needs to be a lot more put into advertising in order to drum it into the publics heads at ports,airports on the streets and on tv regarding dumping and the penalties. At the moment the only advertising that i see is for gum litter.Survey teams need to be mobilized starting in the flat land areas/ Black spots to see if the locals/tennents know from start to finnish what to do with their waste.E.g.what’s the bin collection day, where do i purchase a pre-paid bag/tag. how to seperate the waste at source etc.Finally the Litter Warden service is invisible to the public…Introduce a team of wardens all working off a vehicle suitable for investigating the waste on site in full view of the public and should have all the proper markings on the vehicle explaining what the the wardens are doing and when fines are issued stop at nothing to obtain a prosecution through the courts. A team leader/Manager should follow up on every fine/direct prosecution that did not reach the courts to ask why and what can be learned the next time. A fixed penalty notice SHOULD NOT LAPSE..
Reply to this comment
Gavin Stokes, posted on 2018.10.15
I think as Mark suggested a team of highly visible litter wardens would help greatly. If people suspect there might be someone watching they will be less likely to dump waste. Also maybe an advert campaign asking people to report anyone they see dumping, coming from the angle of “its your area, own it”
Reply to this comment
Mike S, posted on 2018.10.23
WRT your tweet on improving household waste services (https://twitter.com/DCCbeta/status/1054350314910953474?s=03). Get bin collection providers to offer smaller bins to people who want them (keep the frequency of collection the same).
Reply to this comment
Cian McK, posted on 2018.10.23
Why do you think people illegally dump their household waste? If it were you doing it, why would you be sneaking out at night to place last weeks’ rubbish on the the street? Because you just love making Dublin dirty? Because you feel the seagulls need a feed? Or would it be because you just couldn’t be bothered to play along in a situation where a basic service has been privatized, (yet doesn’t even offer a competitive market), a situation where the onus is on you every week to go to the shop, take out your wallet, hand over cash for bin bags, then go home, find some space in the stairwell to place those bags (because they’ll start to smell in the apartment and you don’t have a balcony or garden), make room for them without obstructing an exit, and then look up the calendar the bin company has on their website (they don’t bother sending it to you), find the day that they will collect the bins on your street, then set an alarm for that day, to come home at the right time, to not miss the bin truck, within that two-hour window between 17-19 that they say to leave the bins out, hmm… I wonder why people illegally dump? Make it easier for people, by giving them an annual bill, make sure they pay it, and provide council bins on every other street corner, like they do in other countries.
Reply to this comment
Paula b, posted on 2018.10.25
A reduction in the amount of waste being generated would be a helpful addition to any new system implemented. I believe Austria is leading the way in putting the responsibility of the waste generated into the hands of the manufacturers. At present I do most of my shopping at Aldi and I say for a fact that most of their packaging is excessive and non-recyclable. Put the responsibility on them and other stores to reduce non-recyclable packaging and it could improve the efficiency of the waste disposal system as a whole.
Reply to this comment
Paul, posted on 2018.10.25
This is a serious issue. I live in Inchicore and a couple of private rented properties in the past few months left their black and green bins accross the road and instead of using them started leaving their rubbish outside their properties. I reported to the council litter Twitter page got no reply. I then rang the council litter hotline and reported the issue along with house addresses and suggested a litter warden look in to it. It seems nothing was done and in the past few months other properties along Tyrconnell Road have now started dumping. This has led to large number of rubbish bags along the road every day. The council small litter vans are constantly collecting this rubbish. There needs to be consequences for such behaviour. I know DCC did try naming and shaming and putting up photo proof of people but had to cease this because of privacy issues. It’s a shame that people can get away with this behaviour.
Reply to this comment
Janine , posted on 2019.05.15
I live in an area where dumping and overcrowding in properties is rife. The only way to permanently fix this problem is for the government to take back ownership of the waste removal services and to provide communal bins for all types of waste like they have in Portugal.
Reply to this comment
steve gro, posted on 2019.05.30
People Dump as they see no other alternative, due to either financial restrictions, lack of education or laziness. Being no further than 300m from Designated areas for underground recycling bins within the greater city area would help solve this. Most other European countries provide such facilities. I have seen them as common place in Spain, France, Germany Denmark, Netherlands. If the council provided an underground pit into which the private companies could drop a bin with a small chute visible overground. Access to the bin could be provided using a barcode/QR code system controlling access. Those pits could be licenced to service providers or owned and operated by the council. Also A bottle and Can credit system was in place credits could be earned for recycling which would then allow people to pay for their non-recyclables disposal. This would also be a means to providing a decent recycling infrastructure for the city. See an example of such a system here https://bit.ly/2Ke6R7N
Reply to this comment
Niall, posted on 2019.06.18
We used to have free waste collection services provided by Dublin City Council and no illegal dumping problem. These services were then charged for and privatized. This created our illegal dumping problem. The solution is to provide a free waste collection service.
Reply to this comment
smallbagsnowplease, posted on 2019.07.27
HALF SIZE BIN BAGS COLLECTED WEEKLY - BIG HELP, SIMPLE AND OBVIOUS. BETTER HYGIENE FOR HOME AND CITY. SMALLER BURDEN FOR WASTE WORKERS AND HOUSEHOLDERS ALIKE. ENDS FINANCIAL DISCRIMINATION AGAINST THE SINGLE, THE ELDERLY AND PHYSICALLY LESS ABLE PEOPLE WHO HAVE TO PAY A HIGHER RATE FOR THE SAME SERVICE IN TERMS OF BUYING BAGS MORE FREQUENTLY AND PUTTING THEM OUT HALF-FULL - WHICH ONLY PROFITS THE PRIVATE COMPANIES, OR STORING GARBAGE LONGER THAN IDEAL JUST TO GET THEM FULL. MAKING THE PROVISION OF A FAIRLY PRICED SMALL BAG OPTION AN OBLIGATION FOR WASTE COMPANIES MIGHT EVEN HELP WITH REDUCING THE DUMPING THAT PEOPLE ARE SO FURIOUS ABOUT, AS IT WILL ALLOW PEOPLE ON LOW INCOMES TO MANAGE THE COSTS MORE EASILY.
Reply to this comment
Michael Wickham Moriarty, posted on 2019.08.06
Require any business in receipt of payments from Dublin City Council- grants, supplier payment etc, to provide proof that they are paying for waste management rather than illegally dumping
Reply to this comment
Chris Murnane, posted on 2019.08.15
There should be a shift away from waste bag collection on the street to localised shared waste facilities.
Bags left out for collection, clog up already busy pavements, are susceptible to being scavenged by wildlife (read seagulls) and vermin scavenging through them and result in collection lorries meandering through ever alley and cul de sac in the city - resulting in increased pollution and traffic.
Reply to this comment
Janine , posted on 2019.08.15
All the above ideas are excellent however trying to get them implemented is a struggle. there is constant dumping on my street and I have tried endlessly to get this issue sorted.
Reply to this comment
Clare Spain, posted on 2019.09.06
Once-a-month large waste collection service for areas where there’s currently a bag collection - we’ve a problem in Stoneybatter with people dumping furniture and other items that don’t fit into a bin bag. Many people in the area don’t have cars, making it difficult for them to access civic amenity sites to dispose of large waste properly.
Reply to this comment
AL, posted on 2020.01.21
I really think landlords should be mads responsible for rubbish .
They charge enough , and tenants are hard to find to prosecute.
Reply to this comment
Proinsias Mac Fhlannchadha, posted on 2020.07.28
The number of residential/ civic/commercial units that refuse to avail of a waste collection service in the city and the unauthorised waste activities that arises from some people that do not avail of an authorised waste collection service will continue to be a challenge to effecting any change in the levels of illegal dumping in the city. At present, I believe that there is no central register maintained by the council to track all those units within city environs that are not registered with an authorised waste provider.
DCC, in partnership with the other 3 local authorities in Dublin, should commit to building an online database
of all residential, civic and commercial properties in the city utilising the Eircode system. All registered waste providers will have to submit/ upload information in real time on all registered users. This information can be further expanded to account for the number of lifts, date of last lift and the weight of materials collected. This will build a rich database of information and allow for wardens to better target specific properties for non-compliance with the bye laws. There is a legal basis to collect this information as it is a requirement in the bye laws of the city. Waste providers will have to upgrade IT infrastructure and technology on trucks in order to build up this rich data. This information can be mapper against data sets such as the Vacant property register to better target specific units.
Reply to this comment
Jane Doe, posted on 2021.02.25
There should be collective containers with an access code/card where you can throw in a bag and pay accordingly based on Eircode for instance.
Reply to this comment